Entry 3 – Reflection

 Entry 3 – Reflection

 

This week’s topics and objectives have provided a good starting point for this subject. The objectives have framed the scope of Web 2.0 technologies (i.e., hat they are and what they are not). There is a clear alignment between Web 2.0 and the platforms that support it intent.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 3: Reflection

  There was a strong focus this week on informal and formal learning for me. The beauty of social media platforms is that offer opportunities for both depending on the target audience, context, triggers for learning and the objectives of the learning activity. The functionality of social media platforms is powerful in terms of addressing a range of leaning needs; however, it also requires skills operators who can select the right platform and structure the learning content coherent (relative to the platform) in order to achieve the stated objectives.
Read more

Week 4: Reflection

I learnt a few new things this week relative to digital badges, crowdsourcing and tagging. I think they all have utility relative to online learning environments and they are certainly reflective of Web2.0 technologies. I think both crowdsourcing and tagging can be applied effectively to establish useful links between individuals that can then lead to deeper understanding and a broader context for the application of critical thinking skills.
Read more

Entry 1 – Web 2.0

  Entry 1 – Web 2.0   From what I understand at this stage (early doors), Web 2.0 is characterised by interactive sites and platforms that facilitate participation, collaboration and content creation. Web 1.0 technologies (i.e., static websites) provided limited functionality that supported interaction. Web 2.0 has a focus on the generation and sharing of content through aligned platforms (i.e., blogs, wikis). Other characteristics include: the hosting of content via cloud based services; real time interaction; and the sharing of media.
Read more